Manufacturing Case Study

How Process Pilot Helped One Manufacturer Gain Visibility and Unlock £13M+ in Value

See how a high-volume manufacturer increased OEE from 63% to 85%, unlocked £13M in value, and avoided new machinery using Process Pilot.

Executive Summary

Despite decades of investment in automation, ERP platforms, and continuous improvement programs, many manufacturers still operate far below their true capacity. Machines run. Orders ship. Overtime becomes routine. Yet performance feels capped, and leadership assumes the only way forward is additional capital investment.

This case study tells a different story.

By combining Process Pilot with Microsoft Dynamics 365, one high-volume manufacturer uncovered hidden constraints inside its existing operation and unlocked more than £13.5 million in incremental annual profit, without buying a single new machine.

This is a proof point for what manufacturing process optimization can achieve when real operational data is finally connected, contextualized, and acted on.

Continue reading to learn how SNCL helped one manufacturer revolutionize how they used their existing data to create a lasting impact.

The Hidden Cost of Manufacturing Inefficiency

On paper, this manufacturer looked healthy. Demand was strong. Equipment utilization appeared reasonable. Teams were experienced and engaged.

Yet the plant consistently operated at just 63% overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). Leadership believed the site was nearing its practical limit. To meet future demand, the assumed solution was straightforward but expensive: purchase additional machines at a cost of more than £1.5 million per unit.

Before committing to that investment, the organization asked a different question: What if the capacity we need already exists, but we cannot see it?

That question became the starting point for deploying Process Pilot.

The Manufacturing Environment: High Volume, High Complexity

This was not a simple operation. The plant ran at scale and under constant pressure.

Operational context included:

  • 24/7 production across seven high-speed assembly machines
  • More than 3.2 million assemblies produced each week
  • Semi-automated lines with operator-assisted loading, monitoring, and packing
  • Frequent batch changes driven by product mix and traceability requirements
  • Machines of varying age, capability, and performance profiles

Despite strong demand, the site struggled to hit output targets without escalating overtime, weekend shifts, and maintenance firefighting.

The symptoms were clear. The root causes were not.

Where Performance Was Being Lost

Traditional reporting showed utilization averages around 81.5%, which seemed acceptable at a glance. But deeper variability told a different story.

Some lines regularly dropped as low as 60% utilization. Batch changeovers consumed nearly four hours per day per machine. Scheduling decisions were made primarily by volume and due date, with little consideration for how different products actually behaved on different machines.

Maintenance teams faced long delays waiting for overseas replacement parts. Performance data existed, but it lived in disconnected systems and spreadsheets, preventing any holistic analysis.

The result was a familiar manufacturing paradox: plenty of data, very little insight.

The Real Cost of Low OEE

When the data was finally normalized and analyzed, the financial impact of inefficiency became impossible to ignore.

At design capacity:

  • 100% OEE supported 246.9 million assemblies per year

At actual performance:

  • 63% OEE produced just 155.6 million assemblies per year

That gap represented lost opportunity on an enormous scale.

Each 1% increase in OEE equated to:

  • 7,056 additional assemblies per day
  • £1,764 per day in value
  • £617,400 per year in incremental profit

By moving from 63% to 85% OEE, the manufacturer unlocked:

  • 54.4 million additional assemblies annually
  • £13.58 million in incremental profit
  • Deferred capital equipment purchases worth millions

The question shifted from “Can we afford to improve?” to “How did we miss this?”

Introducing Process Pilot: Seeing the Process End-to-End

Process Pilot was deployed alongside Dynamics 365 to analyze real transactional data flowing through the production environment. This was not a theoretical model or a manual time study. It was a digital representation of how work actually moved.

Process Pilot connected:

  • Material consumption and finished-goods scanning
  • IoT-captured machine stoppages and downtime
  • Product mix, batch size, and order sequencing
  • Maintenance events and changeovers
  • Operator- and line-level performance variation

For the first time, leadership could see the entire manufacturing process as it truly operated, not as it was assumed to operate.

What the Data Revealed

The insights were immediate and actionable.

Process Pilot exposed:

  • Highly inconsistent batch changeover durations across identical machines
  • Clear performance differences based on specific product-machine pairings
  • Certain operators consistently achieving faster, more stable runs
  • Recurring maintenance failures tied to the same components
  • Scheduling decisions that unintentionally amplified downtime

The root cause became clear. Machines were scheduled by volume alone, without considering how product mix affected speed, setup time, and operational stability.

Testing “What-If” Scenarios Before Making Changes

Rather than rushing to the shop floor with new rules, the team used Process Pilot to simulate improvements digitally.

They tested scenarios including:

  • Reduced changeover durations
  • Optimized product-to-machine assignments
  • Alternative sequencing strategies
  • Labor reallocation by skill level
  • Batch size increases for low-risk, stable products

This approach removed risk from decision-making. Improvements could be validated in data before disrupting live production.

The Breakthrough: Smarter Scheduling, Not More Machines

The breakthrough was not a new technology or a massive investment. It was a smarter way of running what already existed.

Key changes implemented included:

  • Routing products to machines where they performed best
  • Fully optimizing six lines for speed and minimal changeover
  • Dedicating one line to complex or difficult builds
  • Assigning highly skilled operators to the most challenging line
  • Increasing batch sizes by more than 200% for stable products
  • Optimizing maintenance spares and introducing structured 5S practices

No new machines were added. The system simply began working the way it should have all along.

The Results: World-Class Manufacturing Performance

Operational Gains

  • Output increased by 50,000+ units per shift
  • Downtime reduced by more than 70%
  • OEE increased from 63% to 85%+
  • Six machines regularly operating near or above 90% OEE

Financial and Business Impact

  • £13.5M+ in incremental annual profit
  • Reduced overtime and weekend labor
  • Deferred capital equipment investment
  • Improved on-time, in-full delivery
  • Increased global market share despite competitive pressure

This was not an incremental improvement; it was a full transformation.

The Human Impact: A Better Way to Work

The benefits extended far beyond metrics.

Operators experienced fewer breakdowns and interruptions. Maintenance teams moved from reactive firefighting to proactive planning. Clear, shared data replaced guesswork and blanket targets.

Jobs became more predictable and manageable. Employee satisfaction increased as the operation stabilized.

Process visibility did not just improve output. It improved the day-to-day experience of work.

From One Project to a Continuous Improvement Culture

Perhaps the most lasting impact was cultural.

With real process visibility:

  • Performance targets became realistic and actionable
  • Lean and Six Sigma initiatives gained credible data foundations
  • Automated data collection became standard practice
  • The organization positioned itself for AI-driven optimization and intelligent agents

This was no longer a one-off project. It was the foundation of continuous improvement at scale.

Why This Matters for Manufacturers Today

Many manufacturers believe they are capacity constrained when they are actually process constrained.

The data needed to improve performance already exists, but it is rarely connected, contextualized, or trusted. Process Pilot changes that.

World-class manufacturing does not start with new machines. It starts with visibility.

Unlock Hidden Capacity Before Buying New Machines

If your operation is pushing overtime, considering new equipment, or struggling to hit OEE targets, the opportunity may already be hidden in your data.

Process Pilot helps manufacturers uncover it.

Schedule a chat with SNCL and discover what your operation is truly capable of achieving.

Get In Touch With SNCL

The trusted partner for getting it right—on time, the first time.
We specialize in turning tech chaos into clarity—quickly identifying root causes and building solutions that reduce costs, optimize operations, and deliver real ROI.